Why Most Communication Training is Absolutely Useless (And What Actually Works)

Connect with us: SB Nation | Medium | Doodle or Die | Manifold Markets | Elephant Journal

Three months ago, I watched a perfectly capable marketing manager completely butcher a client presentation because she couldn't articulate why our proposal was better than the competition. Not because she didn't know the content – she'd written half of it herself. But because when it mattered most, her communication skills fell apart like a cheap umbrella in a Brisbane storm.

That's when it hit me. We're doing workplace communication training all wrong.

I've been running communication workshops for Australian businesses since 2008, and I'm going to tell you something that might upset the training industry: most communication courses are complete garbage. They focus on theory instead of practice, teach presentation skills to people who need basic conversation abilities, and completely ignore the real communication challenges happening in modern workplaces.

The Problem with "Smile and Dial" Communication Training

Here's what drives me absolutely mental about traditional communication training. Companies bring me in, usually after some workplace drama has exploded, and they want their team to learn "better communication skills." Fair enough. But then they hand me a brief that might as well have been written in 1987.

"Teach them active listening," they say. "Show them how to give feedback constructively."

Mate, these people can't even write a coherent email without sounding passive-aggressive. You think they're ready for advanced feedback techniques?

The real issue is that most communication training starts at the wrong level. It's like teaching someone to parallel park before they can start the engine. We assume people have basic communication competence when frankly, about 60% of the workforce struggles with fundamental interpersonal skills.

And don't get me started on those corporate communication seminars where they teach you to "mirror body language" and "maintain appropriate eye contact." That stuff might work in a sales meeting with strangers, but it's weird and artificial when you're trying to sort out why the accounts team won't return the operations manager's calls.

What Actually Happens in Real Workplace Communication

Let me paint you a picture of what communication actually looks like in most Australian offices. It's 2:30 PM on a Wednesday. Sarah from HR needs to discuss a policy change with the warehouse supervisor, Dave. But Dave's been burned before by "policy changes" that usually mean more paperwork and less flexibility.

Sarah approaches this conversation with her corporate training toolkit. She maintains eye contact, uses Dave's name three times in the first minute, and tries to "find common ground." Dave immediately smells bullshit and shuts down.

The real communication challenge here isn't technique – it's trust, context, and understanding what motivates the other person. Sarah needed to acknowledge Dave's legitimate concerns about previous policy disasters, explain the actual benefits for his team, and be straight about any downsides.

But most communication training doesn't teach you how to navigate workplace politics, address underlying tensions, or communicate when there are genuine conflicts of interest. Instead, you get generic advice about "win-win solutions" that sounds great in theory but falls apart when someone's bonus depends on contradictory outcomes.

The Australian Communication Reality Check

Australians communicate differently than Americans, and we definitely communicate differently than the British. We're more direct, less formal, and we appreciate authenticity over corporate speak. Yet most communication training materials are imported from overseas and don't account for local communication styles.

I once had a client – a mining company based in Perth – where the American-trained consultant kept telling the supervisors to use more "appreciative language" and "positive reinforcement." These were blokes managing teams in 45-degree heat, dealing with equipment breakdowns and safety pressures. They needed clear, honest communication skills that worked under stress, not motivational speaking techniques.

When I started focusing on practical, Australian-appropriate communication methods, the results were immediate. Fewer miscommunications, less workplace tension, and actually improved safety outcomes because people felt comfortable raising concerns without corporate jargon getting in the way.

The key was teaching them how to have difficult conversations quickly and honestly, how to give instructions that people actually follow, and how to build trust through consistent, reliable communication. Not how to smile more convincingly.

Why Emotional Intelligence Beats Presentation Skills Every Time

Here's where I'm going to contradict half the communication training industry: presentation skills are vastly overrated. Sure, if you're in sales or senior management, you need to present well. But for most employees, the ability to read a room, understand unspoken concerns, and respond appropriately to emotional cues is infinitely more valuable.

I remember working with a logistics company where the warehouse manager could barely string together a PowerPoint presentation, but he had the best team performance metrics in the company. Why? Because he could sense when someone was struggling, address conflicts before they escalated, and communicate expectations in ways that each individual team member could understand and accept.

Meanwhile, their operations director – MBA qualified, excellent presenter, great at board meetings – couldn't figure out why his directives weren't being followed. He was communicating over people's heads instead of connecting with their actual concerns and motivations.

The best workplace communication training I've seen focuses heavily on emotional intelligence and situational awareness. Teaching people to notice when someone's checked out of a conversation, recognise when they're being defensive, and adjust their approach accordingly.

This isn't touchy-feely stuff – it's practical business intelligence. A manager who can spot early signs of team frustration can address issues before they become resignations. A customer service rep who can read customer emotions can de-escalate problems before they become complaints.

The Technology Problem Nobody Talks About

Let's address the elephant in the room: most workplace communication now happens through screens. Teams messages, emails, video calls, collaborative platforms. Yet most communication training still focuses on face-to-face interaction as if we're all working in 1995.

Digital communication has its own rules, its own challenges, and its own opportunities. The nuance of tone in a Slack message. The way video call delays can make interruptions seem rude when they're actually just technical glitches. The challenge of building relationships with colleagues you might never meet in person.

I've started including significant digital communication components in all my training programs, and it's been eye-opening. Simple things like when to use emoji in professional messages (yes, there are times when it's appropriate), how to structure emails for different audiences, and how to facilitate effective online meetings.

One Sydney tech company I worked with was hemorrhaging talent partly because their remote communication was so poor that people felt isolated and undervalued. We didn't need to teach them presentation skills – we needed to teach them how to create connection and clarity through digital channels.

What Good Communication Training Actually Looks Like

Effective communication training should be messy, practical, and uncomfortable. It should involve real scenarios with genuine stakes, not role-playing exercises with made-up problems.

The best session I ever ran was for a construction company where different trades were constantly miscommunicating about project timelines. Instead of teaching them theoretical communication models, we simulated actual project scenarios with real time pressures and competing priorities.

The electricians learned how their communication style was creating unnecessary stress for the plumbers. The project managers discovered that their "efficient" briefing style was leaving out crucial context that the trades needed to do their jobs properly. And everyone figured out how to ask for clarification without sounding incompetent.

That's the kind of learning that sticks. When people understand the real impact of their communication choices on their colleagues' work and stress levels, they're motivated to change in ways that generic "active listening" workshops never achieve.

I also believe in teaching people how to communicate when they're angry, stressed, or under pressure. Because let's be honest – that's when most workplace communication breaks down. It's easy to be a good communicator when everything's going smoothly. The real skill is maintaining clarity and professionalism when the project's behind schedule, the client's unhappy, and your team's feeling overwhelmed.

The ROI of Actually Useful Communication Training

Companies spend thousands on communication training that doesn't work, then wonder why their workplace culture remains toxic and their productivity stays flat. But when you invest in communication training that addresses real workplace challenges, the returns are substantial and measurable.

Better communication leads to fewer misunderstandings, which means less time wasted on clarification and rework. Improved team communication reduces conflict and turnover. Stronger client communication skills increase satisfaction and retention.

But here's the thing most business leaders miss: good communication training pays for itself through improved employee engagement and reduced stress-related absences. When people can communicate effectively with their colleagues and managers, work becomes less frustrating and more collaborative.

One manufacturing client calculated that their investment in practical communication training paid for itself within six months through reduced recruitment costs alone. People weren't leaving because of poor management communication anymore.

Getting Communication Training Right

If you're considering communication training for your team, here's my advice: skip anything that promises quick fixes or focuses primarily on presentation techniques. Look for training that addresses your specific workplace communication challenges with practical, scenario-based learning.

Good communication training should leave people feeling more confident about having difficult conversations, clearer about how their communication affects others, and equipped with practical strategies they can use immediately.

And for heaven's sake, make sure the trainer understands Australian workplace culture. We don't need more imported corporate communication styles that make people sound like walking LinkedIn posts.

The goal isn't to turn everyone into polished corporate speakers. It's to help people communicate honestly, clearly, and effectively in ways that build trust and get things done.

Because at the end of the day, that's what actually matters in the real world of Australian business. Not whether you can deliver a perfect presentation, but whether you can have the conversations that need to happen to keep your team functioning and your customers happy.

And that's a skill worth investing in properly.